Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Patris's avatar

Like many in my generation was raised in both fear of the bomb and a shared vindictiveness that excused its use in punishing (because let’s face it that’s so often the impetus for going to war - to make them hurt and to proudly stand over someone who you’ve just punched in the throat for hurting you or worse your sister brother mother father your home). Even now I take solace in the fact that American young men weren’t put through a meat grinder on the Japanese mainland defended by soldiers and citizens clasping the bushido requirement of Japanese soldiers to die taking as many of your enemies with you.

So we’re left with this tragedy we inflicted. Horrified and fascinated, like spying a car wreck from the back of your family’s station wagon on a highway travelling to visit a favorite uncle. Do we reject it wholly though? I don’t believe we do, like a condemned killer awaiting execution in a jail cell telling himself “I would do it again...”

Expand full comment
Firewagon's avatar

"The rules were changed from tackle to two-hand touch because of all the irradiated glass shards from the atomic blast remaining on the turf." As little was yet known about 'radiation' from an atomic blast, one might forgive our Marines for being that ignorant to play on any surface with ANY KIND of "glass shards," much less "irradiated glass!" Then again, I've known Marines that wudda 'low crawled' over those glass shards for many even more bizarre reasons. ;)

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts